URLX
Development data

URLX Engine v0.3 · Simulation layer

URLX Valuation Sensitivity

Every scenario below is simulated in memory from the current stored measurement. Nothing is written to the record: stored metrics, scores, valuations, snapshots, provenance and the audit log are untouched. URLX-FV-0.1 and URLX-SC-0.1 run unchanged.

Illustrative / Development Data
URLX Valuation Sensitivity — heatmapMean ΔURLX Fair Value™ · 63 assets
Variable−20%−10%Base+10%+20%Elasticity
Traffic-0.08%-0.06%—+0.03%+0.03%0.00×
Monthly revenue-20.01%-10.01%—+10.01%+20.02%1.00×
Revenue growth-1.48%-0.73%—+0.66%+1.35%0.08×
Traffic growth-0.20%-0.13%—+0.04%+0.05%0.01×
Engagement-1.21%-0.64%—+0.52%+1.02%0.06×
URLX Score™-11.89%-5.89%—+6.00%+11.81%0.59×

Colour intensity shows how far URLX Fair Value™ moves when the input changes. Elasticity is the average Fair Value change divided by the input change: 1.00× is proportional. URLX Score™ is shown as an output variable and excluded from sensitivity shares.

Valuation drivers — share of measured sensitivity
Monthly revenue87.4%

±10% input → +10.01% / -10.01% Fair Value · range across assets 15.00%–15.49%

Revenue growth6.7%

±10% input → +0.66% / -0.73% Fair Value · range across assets 0.15%–2.86%

Engagement4.9%

±10% input → +0.52% / -0.64% Fair Value · range across assets 0.46%–1.25%

Traffic growth0.7%

±10% input → +0.04% / -0.13% Fair Value · range across assets 0.00%–0.42%

Traffic0.3%

±10% input → +0.03% / -0.06% Fair Value · range across assets 0.00%–0.42%

Stress test findings
  • ›If traffic increases 10%, URLX Fair Value™ changes by +0.03%.
  • ›If monthly revenue increases 10%, URLX Fair Value™ changes by +10.01%.
  • ›If revenue growth increases 10%, URLX Fair Value™ changes by +0.66%.
  • ›If traffic growth increases 10%, URLX Fair Value™ changes by +0.04%.
  • ›If engagement increases 10%, URLX Fair Value™ changes by +0.52%.
  • ›Traffic is responsible for approximately 0.3% of valuation sensitivity.
  • ›Monthly revenue is responsible for approximately 87.4% of valuation sensitivity.
  • ›Revenue growth is responsible for approximately 6.7% of valuation sensitivity.
  • ›Traffic growth is responsible for approximately 0.7% of valuation sensitivity.
  • ›Engagement is responsible for approximately 4.9% of valuation sensitivity.
URLX Methodology DiagnosticsPotentially anomalous

2 variable(s) produced non-monotonic or inverted valuation responses and need review before URLX-FV-0.2.

Sensitivity concentration

87.4% · Concentrated

Assets tested

63

Methodology under test

URLX-FV-0.1 · URLX-SC-0.1

Traffic
Underweighted

Elasticity 0.00× · share 0.3% · asymmetry 62.0%

A 10% change in traffic moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 0.03% on average. Responsible for approximately 0.3% of measured valuation sensitivity. Changing this measurement barely affects value under URLX-FV-0.1.

Monthly revenue
StableOverweighted

Elasticity 1.00× · share 87.4% · asymmetry 0.0%

A 10% change in monthly revenue moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 10.01% on average. Responsible for approximately 87.4% of measured valuation sensitivity.

Revenue growth
StablePotentially anomalous

Elasticity 0.08× · share 6.7% · asymmetry 8.7%

A 10% change in revenue growth moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 0.66% on average. Responsible for approximately 6.7% of measured valuation sensitivity. 6 of 63 assets move the wrong way when this input rises — review required.

Traffic growth
UnderweightedPotentially anomalous

Elasticity 0.01× · share 0.7% · asymmetry 60.7%

A 10% change in traffic growth moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 0.04% on average. Responsible for approximately 0.7% of measured valuation sensitivity. 2 of 63 assets move the wrong way when this input rises — review required. Changing this measurement barely affects value under URLX-FV-0.1.

Engagement
StableNonlinearUnderweighted

Elasticity 0.06× · share 4.9% · asymmetry 16.6%

A 10% change in engagement moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 0.52% on average. Responsible for approximately 4.9% of measured valuation sensitivity. Upside and downside responses differ by 16.6%, so the response is not linear.

URLX Score™
Stable

Elasticity 0.59× · share 0.0% · asymmetry 0.5%

A 10% change in the URLX Score™ moves URLX Fair Value™ by about 6.00% on average.

Development notice

These diagnostics describe how the URLX-FV-0.1 development prototype behaves under simulated input changes on illustrative development data. They are not a validation of the methodology, and no formula has been changed. Findings here are intended as evidence for a future URLX-FV-0.2.

Per-asset stress test63 assets simulated
URLX Sensitivity Matrix — amazon.comBase score 86 · $1.82T · URLX-FV-0.1
ChangeInputURLX Score™Fair Value™Δ Fair ValueConfidence
Traffic · base 3.20B
−20%2.56B86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
−10%2.88B86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
Base3.20B86±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%3.52B86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
+20%3.84B86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
Monthly revenue · base $24.50B
−20%$19.60B86±0$1.46T-20.00%HIGH
−10%$22.05B86±0$1.64T-10.00%HIGH
Base$24.50B86±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%$26.95B86±0$2.01T+10.00%HIGH
+20%$29.40B86±0$2.19T+20.00%HIGH
Revenue growth · base 14.0%
−20%11.2%85-1$1.77T-3.17%HIGH
−10%12.6%86±0$1.80T-1.23%HIGH
Base14.0%86±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%15.4%86±0$1.85T+1.23%HIGH
+20%16.8%86±0$1.87T+2.46%HIGH
Traffic growth · base 6.7%
−20%5.4%86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
−10%6.0%86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
Base6.7%86±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%7.4%86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
+20%8.0%86±0$1.82T0.00%HIGH
Engagement · base 88.0%
−20%70.4%84-2$1.80T-1.47%MEDIUM
−10%79.2%85-1$1.81T-0.74%HIGH
Base88.0%86±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%96.8%87+1$1.84T+0.74%HIGH
+20%100.0%87+1$1.84T+0.74%HIGH
URLX Score™ · base 86
−20%6969-17$1.60T-12.50%LOW
−10%7777-9$1.70T-6.62%MEDIUM
Base8686±0$1.82T—HIGH
+10%9595+9$1.94T+6.62%HIGH
+20%100100+14$2.01T+10.29%HIGH